Broker Not Accountable for Passing on Insurer's Instructions
Broker Not Accountable for Passing on Insurer's Instructions
The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
An Australian homeowner's effort to hold his insurance broker responsible for allegedly misleading him about coverage for emergency tree removal has been dismissed by regulatory authorities.
The incident unfolded following a storm that impaired trees on the insured premises.
Initially, the homeowner looked to claim a compensation from the insurer for clearing debris. However, he was informed that his policy would not cater to the removal of trees unless they caused damage to the property itself. Consequently, he took the matter to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), accusing his broker, Aon, of misguiding him in a conversation last December by implying that the insurer would bear the make-safe costs.
The homeowner presented AFCA with an invoice totaling $17,217 for tree removal to establish safe machinery access and an additional invoice of $7370 for further clearance. Aon contested the claim, asserting that their broker merely communicated the details relayed by the insurer to the complainant.
Aon backed its position with contact notes from the insurer which included recommendations to "remove dangerous hanging limbs as part of a make-safe, ensuring photos were taken of the removed limbs."
Records show that the broker had questioned the insurer about the policy's inapplicability concerning make-safe operations. "Our client has now been informed by the assessor that this 'make-safe' work is not covered – surely this would be considered make-safe work, given the alternative risks, such as electrocution or being hit by a falling tree or limb?†Bhupendranathmmmsiddharth_techtw, the email to the insurer reportedly asked.
AFCA’s ruling underscored that although the homeowner conducted the work thinking it would be covered by the policy, the actions of the broker were not prejudicial. The authority noted that the broker had diligently informed the client to document the procedures, yet there was no indication that a more extensive range of work was covered under the existing policy terms.
AFCA summized that in this event The broker did not make any remark or conduct any act that was misleading and deceptive, as it merely transmitted the information received from the insurer and that had the information provided been inaccurate, the fault lies not with the broker, but with the original source of information.
Additionally, AFCA clarified that even in instances of potentially misleading information, the homeowner may not have sustained a financial loss since the insurer would likely have not compensated for the make-safe work under any circumstances. Regardless of the insurance policy specifics, the complainant was obliged to conduct the necessary safety works. Even if there was incorrect information passed from the insurer by the broker, the liability cannot be placed on the broker by simply relaying what they were informed.
This decision supports the conclusion that Aon, as a broker, carried out its duty by correctly conveying the insurer's instructions and therefore, should not bear the burden of liability for the disputed costs.
This case offers a valuable lesson in understanding where liabilities begin and end in the complex web of insurer-broker-customer communications, reminding policyholders to scrutinize the fine details of insurance contracts.
Original information for this article was sourced from Insurance News.
Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.
Recent rural reporting has pointed to renewed mouse activity across parts of the grain belt, with growers being urged to monitor paddocks, sheds and stored grain as seasonal conditions become more favourable for breeding. For many producers, the immediate concern is practical: protecting emerging crops, keeping grain storage secure and acting early before damage becomes expensive or difficult to contain. - read more
Recent rural reporting has again highlighted the strain dry seasonal conditions can place on livestock producers, particularly where pasture growth is limited, supplementary feed is expensive and water security is becoming a daily management issue. For many Australian farm businesses, the immediate concern is practical: keeping stock in condition, deciding whether to buy feed, move animals, agist, or sell earlier than planned. - read more
Recent rural reporting has again pointed to frost as a live concern for grain and mixed farming regions after a season that, in many districts, began with improved moisture and renewed confidence. For growers, the message is familiar but important: a good start does not guarantee a clean finish. Frost can arrive quickly, affect paddocks unevenly and turn strong yield expectations into a much more complicated financial picture. - read more
Recent rural reporting on Queensland fruit fly pressure in horticultural regions is a timely reminder that biosecurity is not only a production issue. For orchardists, vegetable growers and mixed farms with small horticulture enterprises, a pest detection can affect far more than the crop in the paddock. It can influence picking schedules, packing arrangements, transport routes, labour planning, market access and cash flow. - read more
Recent rural reporting has pointed to a more encouraging winter moisture profile across parts of the eastern and southern farming regions, with many growers seeing improved crop prospects after a difficult start in some districts. For farm businesses, that is welcome news. Better soil moisture can support establishment, pasture growth and yield potential, but it does not remove the need for disciplined risk planning. - read more
Grain Central reported on 23 July 2026 that Australian grain prices have continued to firm, supported by global wheat market heat and local uncertainty about new-crop production. For growers, the story is not simply about better prices. It is also a reminder that a promising crop can still carry significant risk when weather, timing and market volatility start moving together. - read more
A second H5 bird flu detection in New South Wales has moved avian disease risk from a distant global concern to a practical on-farm planning issue for Australian producers. The latest case involved a petrel found at Hawks Nest on the NSW Mid North Coast, following an earlier detection at the same beach. Authorities have indicated the human health risk remains low, and there has been no reported H5 detection in NSW commercial poultry flocks at this stage. - read more
On 3 July 2026, Grain Central reported that RAGT Australia’s SowSure crop establishment protection initiative had received $982,049 through the Australian Government’s Future Drought Fund. For grain growers, the news is notable because it places insurance-style thinking closer to the sowing decision, rather than waiting until later-season losses become obvious. - read more
A recent quad bike fatality case in New South Wales has put farm safety, workplace liability and risk management back under close attention. ABC Rural reported on 2 July 2026 that Wumbulgal Agriculture Pty Ltd was fined $555,000 after an 82-year-old worker died in a quad bike accident at Yenda in the Riverina in February 2023. The company was found to have breached work health and safety obligations. - read more
Australian farmers now have clearer, but tighter, rules for two widely used knockdown herbicides after the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority finalised its review of paraquat and diquat on 23 June 2026. The chemicals have not been removed from the market, but their continued use will sit behind significant new conditions affecting application rates, equipment, handling systems and worker protection. - read more
Farm insurance documents can be detailed, but understanding the key terms, exclusions, disclosure duties and complaint pathways can help Australian farmers review policies, renewals and quotes more confidently. - read more
Farm liability insurance helps protect farming operations from the financial impact of legal claims, bodily injury allegations, property damage claims and other liabilities connected with farm activities. Its value depends on your farm's size, activities, risk profile, cover limits and the potential cost of an uninsured claim. - read more
Farm machinery is central to many Australian farming operations, from tractors and harvesters to other essential equipment. Because this machinery can be costly to repair or replace, farm equipment insurance can help farmers manage financial risks such as theft, fire, accidental damage and other insured events. - read more
Farm machinery is central to many Australian farming operations, from tractors and harvesters to pumps, trailers, drones and robotic systems. This checklist explains how to assess farm equipment insurance needs, identify key risks and review policy details without overlooking important machinery, records or exclusions. - read more
Welcome to the first steps in future-proofing your farming legacy. When we think about the hustle and bustle of daily farm life, it's easy to overlook the critical importance of estate planning. For the Australian farmer, estate planning is not just a matter of securing your assets; it's about ensuring the survival and progression of your hard-earned labour to the next generation. - read more
Commercial farm insurance can help Australian farm businesses manage risks across property, machinery, livestock, crops, liability, staff, contractors and business interruption. This guide explains how commercial farm cover works and how it differs from hobby farm insurance. - read more
Farm insurance is usually made up of several cover types that can be adjusted to suit the way a farm operates. This guide explains how Australian farmers can think about cover for tractors and equipment, livestock, crops, buildings, liability and business interruption risks without relying on a one-size-fits-all policy. - read more
Technology is now central to many Australian farming operations, from connected machinery and drones to crop monitoring, livestock systems, data platforms and online sales channels. These tools can improve efficiency, but they also introduce risks that traditional farm insurance may not fully address. This guide explains how digital farmers can think about agribusiness insurance, cyber risk, equipment cover, claims preparation and regular policy reviews. - read more
Farming is inherently risky. With factors like weather, pests, and market fluctuations affecting crops, it's crucial to manage these risks effectively. - read more
Australian farmers face a unique set of challenges due to the vast and varied climate conditions that sweep across the continent. From the scorching heat and prolonged droughts of the Outback to the tropical storms and torrential rains of the northern regions, weather-related risks are an integral part of agricultural life in Australia. - read more
Need a Quote?
Start your free farm insurance quote comparison here.
Knowledgebase
Flood Insurance: A specific type of property insurance that covers losses and damage caused by flooding.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.