Broker Not Accountable for Passing on Insurer's Instructions

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

An Australian homeowner's effort to hold his insurance broker responsible for allegedly misleading him about coverage for emergency tree removal has been dismissed by regulatory authorities.

The incident unfolded following a storm that impaired trees on the insured premises.

Initially, the homeowner looked to claim a compensation from the insurer for clearing debris. However, he was informed that his policy would not cater to the removal of trees unless they caused damage to the property itself. Consequently, he took the matter to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), accusing his broker, Aon, of misguiding him in a conversation last December by implying that the insurer would bear the make-safe costs.

The homeowner presented AFCA with an invoice totaling $17,217 for tree removal to establish safe machinery access and an additional invoice of $7370 for further clearance. Aon contested the claim, asserting that their broker merely communicated the details relayed by the insurer to the complainant.

Aon backed its position with contact notes from the insurer which included recommendations to "remove dangerous hanging limbs as part of a make-safe, ensuring photos were taken of the removed limbs."

Records show that the broker had questioned the insurer about the policy's inapplicability concerning make-safe operations. "Our client has now been informed by the assessor that this 'make-safe' work is not covered - surely this would be considered make-safe work, given the alternative risks, such as electrocution or being hit by a falling tree or limb?” Bhupendranathmmmsiddharth_techtw, the email to the insurer reportedly asked.

AFCA’s ruling underscored that although the homeowner conducted the work thinking it would be covered by the policy, the actions of the broker were not prejudicial. The authority noted that the broker had diligently informed the client to document the procedures, yet there was no indication that a more extensive range of work was covered under the existing policy terms.

AFCA summized that in this event The broker did not make any remark or conduct any act that was misleading and deceptive, as it merely transmitted the information received from the insurer and that had the information provided been inaccurate, the fault lies not with the broker, but with the original source of information.

Additionally, AFCA clarified that even in instances of potentially misleading information, the homeowner may not have sustained a financial loss since the insurer would likely have not compensated for the make-safe work under any circumstances. Regardless of the insurance policy specifics, the complainant was obliged to conduct the necessary safety works. Even if there was incorrect information passed from the insurer by the broker, the liability cannot be placed on the broker by simply relaying what they were informed.

This decision supports the conclusion that Aon, as a broker, carried out its duty by correctly conveying the insurer's instructions and therefore, should not bear the burden of liability for the disputed costs.

This case offers a valuable lesson in understanding where liabilities begin and end in the complex web of insurer-broker-customer communications, reminding policyholders to scrutinize the fine details of insurance contracts.

Original information for this article was sourced from Insurance News.

Published:Friday, 11th Oct 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Inattention and Speed Identified as Key Factors in Australian Truck Crashes

06 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori

The National Truck Accident Research Centre (NTARC) has released its 2025 Major Incident Investigation Report, shedding light on the primary human factors contributing to significant truck crashes across Australia. The findings emphasise the critical roles of inattention, distraction, and inappropriate speed in these incidents, underscoring the necessity for targeted safety interventions within the transport industry. - read more

QBE and Sure Insurance Forge New Home Cover Partnership

06 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori

QBE Australia Pacific has recently entered into a strategic partnership with Sure Insurance, aiming to bolster its broker-distributed householders cover. This collaboration signifies a concerted effort to provide more comprehensive and accessible home insurance solutions tailored to the diverse needs of Australian homeowners. - read more

Blue Zebra Enhances Insurance Offerings with New Underwriting Partnerships

06 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori

Underwriting agency Blue Zebra has recently announced the establishment of new capacity arrangements for its home building and contents, landlord, and small to medium-sized enterprise (SME) package products. This strategic move is set to enhance the agency's ability to offer comprehensive and competitive insurance solutions tailored to the evolving needs of Australian homeowners and business operators. - read more

AIG Australia Penalised for Claims Handling Failures

06 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori

The Insurance Code Governance Committee has imposed a $30,000 penalty on AIG Australia for breaching its obligations related to claims handling. The insurer failed to inform customers about delays in processing their claims and neglected to advise them of their right to escalate complaints to the ombudsman. This regulatory action underscores the critical importance of transparency and communication in the insurance claims process. - read more