Hacked Company Loses Insurance Battle Over Customer Payment Scam

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

A company recently faced a significant setback after losing an insurance claim dispute related to funds stolen in a fraudulent email scheme.

Cybercriminals infiltrated the business's email system, sending out fake invoices that directed clients to pay into a bogus bank account.

Consequently, two customers inadvertently transferred a total of $66,148 to the fraudulent account.

Attempts to retrieve this money were unsuccessful, and the customers refused further payments to the company.

The company, holding a management liability insurance policy, sought to claim under its third-party crime coverage to recover the outstanding bills from the customers. However, AIG Australia denied the claim, stating that the policy only addressed "direct financial loss" from theft or fraud by a third party, and argued that since the stolen money belonged to customers, the business itself did not suffer a direct loss.

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) reviewed the case and acknowledged the company's loss. However, it determined that the loss did not align with the policy's specific terms. The ruling emphasized that only the company's customers faced direct financial loss, whereas the company experienced an indirect one due to subsequent non-payments.

The AFCA explained that the hack did not meet the company's policy definition of theft, as the stolen funds belonged to the customers, not the business. This discrepancy meant that the policy's electronic and computer crime coverage was not applicable. Additionally, the policy's criteria for "fraudulent act," which required acts of forgery or counterfeiting the insured had acted upon, were not met since the company was unaware of the false invoices.

This case highlights the critical distinction between direct and indirect financial losses in insurance claims, emphasizing the importance of understanding policy terms. For businesses, particularly those prone to cyber threats, it underscores the significance of having insurance coverage that appropriately addresses loss scenarios stemming from such events. It also serves as a cautionary tale of the complexities involved in recovering from cybercrime attacks without adequate protection.

Moving forward, businesses should ensure robust cybersecurity measures to prevent similar email hacks, coupled with clarifying insurance policies for adequate coverage against indirect financial losses as a result of customer fraud. This scenario may lead insurance providers to reevaluate their product offerings, potentially driving the development of more comprehensive cybercrime coverages. Additionally, the financial sector might witness increased discussions on how to formulate clearer policy definitions that align with the evolving nature of cyber threats.

Published:Tuesday, 11th Mar 2025
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

ACCC Flags Potential Competition Issues in RACWA's Sale to IAG

04 May 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has expressed significant concerns regarding the proposed acquisition of the Royal Automobile Club of Western Australia's (RACWA) insurance operations by Insurance Australia Group (IAG). The watchdog warns that this transaction could substantially lessen competition in Western Australia's insurance market, potentially leading to higher premiums and reduced options for consumers. - read more