Insurer Rejects Claim Over Diesel Fluid Mix-Up

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

A contentious insurance claim has ended unfavourably for a motor policyholder after her husband mistakenly poured diesel exhaust fluid into her car's fuel tank.

Although the policyholder initially received assurances from a Suncorp representative that the use of AdBlue fluid wouldn't be considered improper fuelling - supposedly an excluded scenario under her policy - the claim was later denied.

This decision has sparked debate around policy definitions and customer service communication.

The policyholder argued that according to the product disclosure statement (PDS), only "incorrect fuel usage" was excluded, and as AdBlue is technically not a fuel, her claim should be valid. Additional grievances arose after alleging the insurer’s tow service inflicted further damage to her car, necessitating a new steering rack and wheel realignment.

Suncorp acknowledged the issue with its initial claim rejection, where the decision was based solely on the original PDS. However, the insurer pointed to a supplementary product disclosure statement (SPDS), which explicitly excludes coverage for damage resulting from using fluids not recommended by the vehicle's manufacturer. This key differentiation was reportedly communicated to the policyholder during her policy renewal.

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) sided with Suncorp, determining that the insurer did not mislead the customer about her claim status. While Suncorp admitted to referencing outdated PDS wording initially, AFCA deemed their reliance on the updated SPDS appropriate and found no obligation for the insurer to cover the incident. Additionally, AFCA found limited evidence to support the policyholder's accusations regarding damage caused by the towing service, reinforcing Suncorp's account of a winched, non-dragged vehicle recovery.

Despite these rulings, AFCA ordered Suncorp to compensate the policyholder $3000 for delay-induced inconveniences during the claim process, which left her without her vehicle for an extended period, citing the resulting undue stress and hassle.

This case highlights the importance of clear communication and understanding of policy amendments, emphasizing the role supplemental documents play during insurance assessments. Consumers are reminded to review documentation thoroughly during renewals to grasp the full scope of their insurance protections and exclusions.

Published:Wednesday, 16th Apr 2025
Source: Paige Estritori

Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Surge in Mental Health Claims Reshapes Australia's Insurance Landscape

02 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori

Australia's insurance industry is experiencing a significant shift as mental health conditions have become the leading cause of total and permanent disability (TPD) claims. Recent data from the Council of Australian Life Insurers (CALI) indicates that mental health issues now account for nearly one-third of all TPD claims, marking a substantial change in the industry's claim patterns. - read more

Businesses Advocate for Reforms Amid Rising Insurance Premiums

01 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori

The Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry, in collaboration with the Insurance Council of Australia, has released a report highlighting the urgent need for coordinated reforms to address the escalating insurance premiums affecting small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). The report underscores that soaring premiums are compelling many SMEs, including beauty salons, to either forgo insurance or reduce coverage, posing significant risks to their operations. - read more

AFCA Determines Home-Based Waxing Salon Is a Business

01 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) recently ruled that a home-based waxing salon operated by a Suncorp customer constitutes a business, not merely a hobby. This decision has significant implications for beauticians managing home-based operations, particularly concerning insurance disclosures and compliance. - read more

ASIC Announces 2025 Focus on Insurance Pricing and Claims Handling

01 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has unveiled its enforcement priorities for 2025, placing a significant emphasis on insurance pricing practices, claims handling, and complaints processes. This initiative aims to enhance consumer protection and ensure fair practices within the insurance industry. - read more