AFCA Supports RAA Insurance in Vehicle Location Dispute

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

An insurance dispute over the location of a vehicle culminated in the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) backing RAA Insurance in their decision to deny a claim.

The issue surrounded the policyholder's claim that her son’s car was stored in South Australia, while the vehicle was allegedly used and registered in Victoria.

The son, who initially filed the claim following an accident in April of the previous year, saw his claim denied by RAA Insurance. The insurance provider, based in South Australia, concluded that the vehicle was a total loss but rejected the claim after discovering the car's purchase and registration in Victoria despite frequent visits to South Australia.

During the claims process, the son portrayed himself as the primary driver, asserting minimal use by his mother, the policyholder. However, he later altered his statements to AFCA, stating that the car was never his and was unregistered in Victoria. AFCA found these new assertions unconvincing due to the lack of documentation supporting his position.

The ombudsman involved in the dispute stated that evidence indicated the vehicle was mainly used, registered, and stored in Victoria at the time the policy was taken out. Consequently, it was determined that the policyholder misrepresented the car's usual location and storage when securing insurance coverage.

RAA Insurance referenced their underwriting standards, emphasizing that they do not extend coverage to vehicles registered outside South Australia or the Broken Hill postcode. A declaration from an RAA employee supported this position, confirming that the vehicle’s Victorian registration would have led to denial of coverage initiation.

AFCA observed that such misrepresentation compromised RAA's risk assessment capabilities, justifying the insurer's decision to decline the claim. The omission of accurate information about the vehicle's storage location led to the policy being issued under false pretenses. AFCA concluded that compelling the insurer to honor the claim would be unjust, given the circumstances.

Published:Thursday, 24th Apr 2025
Source: Paige Estritori

Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Insights from CHU's 2025 Strata Market Report

13 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

CHU, Australia's leading strata insurance underwriting agency, has unveiled its 2025 State of the Strata Market report, offering a comprehensive analysis of the current landscape and future outlook for the strata industry. This report is particularly relevant for property owners and investors seeking to navigate the evolving strata insurance environment. - read more

ICA Advocates for Overhaul of Victoria's Strata Legislation

13 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

The Insurance Council of Australia (ICA) has recently called for significant reforms to Victoria's strata legislation, highlighting concerns that poor governance and deferred maintenance are contributing to increased insurance premiums for the state's strata property owners. This appeal underscores the pressing need for legislative updates to enhance the management and maintenance of strata-titled properties. - read more

NSW Introduces Nation's Strictest Disclosure Rules for Strata Managers

13 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

The New South Wales government has taken a significant step towards enhancing transparency within the strata management sector by introducing legislation that imposes the nation's strictest disclosure obligations on strata managers concerning insurance commissions. This move aims to address longstanding concerns about opaque financial arrangements that have been perceived to disadvantage apartment owners. - read more